For too long, argues Richard Harvey Brown, social scientists have felt forced to
choose between imitating science's empirical methodology and impersonating a
romantic notion of art, the methods of which are seen as primarily a matter of
intuition, interpretation, and opinion. Developing the idea of a "cognitive
aesthetic," Brown shows how both science and art--as well as the human studies
that stand between them--depend on metaphoric thinking as their "logic of
discovery" and may be assessed in terms of such aesthetic criteria of adequacy
as economy, elegance, originality, scope, congruence, and form.
By recognizing this "aesthetic" common ground between science and art, Brown
demonstrates that a fusion